Shown
47% above the 14-day average.
Viewing this channel as it looked on Apr 10, 2026. 18 days before the most recent data.
Open Channel StatsNew ChannelThe smallest maturity stage — only milestone signals fire so thin samples don't drive statistical claims.
2 videos so far · 16 total views
Shown
47% above the 14-day average.
Click rate
1.2 points below the 14-day average.
Views
13% below the 14-day average.
Subscribers
100% above the 14-day average.
Temperature
—
Baseline takes about five weeks to compute.
What's moved in the last 7 days.
This channel is 2 days old. 2 videos published. Currently in the seedling stage. 16 cumulative views.
3 insights are still firing on this channel, but none shifted materially today. This space refills when a new pattern emerges, an existing one fades, or one changes direction.
Suggested Videos
Across 2 recent days, Suggested Videos has contributed 15 views — still below the 30-view threshold, but worth watching: sources that clear the floor usually show up on the traffic page with their own per-video share.
Traffic breakdownThis channel is roughly 2 videos short of the point where the Day-1 predictor detector usually fires. Once it does, the Moment card can surface a correlation between first-day views and later totals on this channel.
What's movingAround 3 more videos on this channel and the relative-outlier detector typically reaches its sample threshold. At that point, videos that sit well above or below the channel's own median get flagged as cross-video outliers in the Moment card.
What's movingWhich videos are the outliers?
Who is finding this channel?
Each river is a traffic source; width follows daily views. Hover a stream to highlight its share over the last few days, or tap to open that source’s detail page.
What share of recent views came from sources where the viewer chose to come back (Direct, Channel Page, Playlist, End Screen, Link). The complementary share is algorithmic discovery (Browse, Suggested, Search). The ratio drifts as a channel matures; both extremes have legitimate channel patterns.
Each week, what share of last week’s viewer mix came back versus how much of the mix is new. Compares the (source, country) buckets that delivered views in consecutive weeks.
Inter-publish gap distribution and the detected publishing pattern across the trailing 28 days. Weekend cells use a cooler tone, weekday cells a warmer one — descriptive only, not a verdict on the schedule.
Publishing cadence appears after the first 28 days.
Day-of-week view tracking starts after 3 full weeks of data (1 so far).
Not enough catalog for cross-video patterns yet. This chapter fills in around the 20th video, when things like "longer videos hold viewers better on this channel" start to have statistical support.
2 of 20 videos so far.
What this data doesn’t tell you.
This site can’t answer that — no one channel can. What it shows you is one real channel, honestly. Every number here is real; nothing has been smoothed or flattered. Compare silently to whatever channels you study most often, and draw your own conclusions.
Real “normal” would come from comparing against many channels at the same stage in the same niche. That’s a future direction; it’s not something one channel’s data can answer today. Country breakdowns — views, average watch, net subscribers — are shown above. Click rate by country isn’t, since YouTube doesn’t report how often a thumbnail was shown by country. Device-type and subscribed-vs-non-subscribed splits aren't shown in this public view.
What we tested:0 hold here·0 don't·0 inconclusive·→ See what we tested
Today's reading
Everything above is small-sample. Pattern-matching on a handful of videos usually produces mostly noise; by around the tenth video more of the chapters fill in with statistically meaningful content.
Most early-stage signals tend to stabilize after the catalog crosses a few dozen videos.