Shown
63% below the 14-day average.
Viewing this channel as it looked on Apr 18, 2026. 10 days before the most recent data.
Open Channel StatsNew ChannelThe smallest maturity stage — only milestone signals fire so thin samples don't drive statistical claims.
10 videos so far · 218 total views
Shown
63% below the 14-day average.
Click rate
1.8 points above the 14-day average.
Views
22% below the 14-day average.
Subscribers
100% below the 14-day average.
Temperature
—
Baseline takes about five weeks to compute.
What's moved in the last 7 days.
This channel is 10 days old. 10 videos published. Currently in the seedling stage. 218 cumulative views.
Suggested Videos has driven roughly 71% of views over the last 7 days.
On Video 1, click rate ran 31% lower over the last three days while average watch duration ran 52% higher than the prior three.
First 5 subscribers on a daily publishing pace
First subscribers on a steady-cadence channel often come from viewers who saw the channel more than once before subscribing — so they tend to reflect return-visit pacing as much as any one video's depth.
Video 3 outrunning the channel median at this age
When a video runs above norm for its age, one common cause is a new traffic source activating (Browse, Suggested, or Search). The traffic breakdown on the video page shows the mix.
A video getting Suggested traffic
Suggested Videos is YouTube matching this video to viewers who watched something similar. For newer channels, it's often where early traction shows up before Browse.
Adjacent-video lift around Video 2
When adjacent videos both land above the channel's typical Day-1, it often correlates with a topic or series resonating — though the proximity alone isn't proof that one helped the other.
Video 3 and its neighbor both above typical Day-1
When adjacent videos both land above the channel's typical Day-1, it often correlates with a topic or series resonating — though the proximity alone isn't proof that one helped the other.
Channel Page
Across 3 recent days, Channel Page has contributed 9 views — still below the 30-view threshold, but worth watching: sources that clear the floor usually show up on the traffic page with their own per-video share.
Traffic breakdownVideo 4 hits Day 7 in about 1 day. Once it crosses, the first-week view shape becomes readable on the video's placement chart.
About 1 more video until the relative-outlier detector has enough sample to fire. When it does, videos that sit well above or below the channel's own median get flagged as cross-video outliers in the Moment card.
What's movingOver the next several days, 4 more videos reach Day 7 — typically the point where same-age first-week comparisons line up on this channel's placement chart.
Which videos are the outliers — notes and lead changes along the bottom.
10 videos in 10 days. Most are still too new to compare against each other — by the 20th video, cross-video shapes start to be honest.
| Video | Published | Days tracked | Views | Primary traffic source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video 10 | Apr 18 | 1 | 6 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 9 | Apr 17 | 2 | 3 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 8 | Apr 16 | 3 | 5 | Browse / Homepage |
| Video 7 | Apr 15 | 2 | 3 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 6 | Apr 14 | 5 | 14 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 5 | Apr 13 | 4 | 2 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 4 | Apr 12 | 5 | 6 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 3 | Apr 11 | 8 | 96 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 2 | Apr 10 | 9 | 61 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 1 | Apr 9 | 8 | 22 | Suggested Videos |
Who is finding this channel?
Discovery phase: Suggested for Viewers — see Traffic.
Each river is a traffic source; width follows daily views. Hover a stream to highlight its share over the last few days, or tap to open that source’s detail page.
What share of recent views came from sources where the viewer chose to come back (Direct, Channel Page, Playlist, End Screen, Link). The complementary share is algorithmic discovery (Browse, Suggested, Search). The ratio drifts as a channel matures; both extremes have legitimate channel patterns.
Each week, what share of last week’s viewer mix came back versus how much of the mix is new. Compares the (source, country) buckets that delivered views in consecutive weeks.
Inter-publish gap distribution and the detected publishing pattern across the trailing 28 days. Weekend cells use a cooler tone, weekday cells a warmer one — descriptive only, not a verdict on the schedule.
Publishing cadence appears after the first 28 days.
Day-of-week view tracking starts after 3 full weeks of data (2 so far).
Not enough catalog for cross-video patterns yet. This chapter fills in around the 20th video, when things like "longer videos hold viewers better on this channel" start to have statistical support.
10 of 20 videos so far.
What this data doesn’t tell you.
This site can’t answer that — no one channel can. What it shows you is one real channel, honestly. Every number here is real; nothing has been smoothed or flattered. Compare silently to whatever channels you study most often, and draw your own conclusions.
Real “normal” would come from comparing against many channels at the same stage in the same niche. That’s a future direction; it’s not something one channel’s data can answer today. Country breakdowns — views, average watch, net subscribers — are shown above. Click rate by country isn’t, since YouTube doesn’t report how often a thumbnail was shown by country. Device-type and subscribed-vs-non-subscribed splits aren't shown in this public view.
Half of this channel's subscribers came from one of 10 videos. Concentration like this is common at small catalogs and is descriptive, not a verdict.
What we tested:0 hold here·0 don't·0 inconclusive·→ See what we tested
Today's reading
Everything above is small-sample. Pattern-matching on a handful of videos usually produces mostly noise; by around the tenth video more of the chapters fill in with statistically meaningful content.
Most early-stage signals tend to stabilize after the catalog crosses a few dozen videos.