Shown
48% below the 14-day average.
Public YouTube analytics dashboard
Viewing this channel as it looked on Apr 24, 2026. 4 days before the most recent data.
Open Channel StatsEarly StagePatterns are starting to show, but the sample is still small enough that trends often shift week to week.
16 daysdays tracked
16 videos so far · 544 total views
Click rate
0.7 points above the 14-day average.
Views
60% below the 14-day average.
Subscribers
100% below the 14-day average.
Temperature
—
Baseline takes about five weeks to compute.
This week
What's moved in the last 7 days.
This channel is 16 days old. 16 videos published. Currently in the sprouting stage. 544 cumulative views.
Suggested Videos has driven roughly 73% of views over the last 7 days.
Recent batch up 300%, older cohorts flat
Median trailing-7-day views climbed 300% across the 7 videos published in week 2026-W16; older cohorts on this channel held nearly flat over the same window.
A recent batch climbing while older cohorts hold steady often points to YouTube finding a fit between the newer videos and a viewer cluster, rather than a channel-wide shift. The pattern usually persists for a week or two before older cohorts catch up or the lift settles.
Also nearby
Momentum
First 8 subscribers on a daily publishing pace
First subscribers on a steady-cadence channel often come from viewers who saw the channel more than once before subscribing — so they tend to reflect return-visit pacing as much as any one video's depth.
Engagement
Video 1: tighter surface, better landing
Click rate rising while impressions fall is usually a sign the impression surface narrowed — fewer thumbnails shown, the ones shown landing better with whoever's seeing them. A common shape after a recommendation surface tightens.
Engagement
Click rate +159%, impressions -89% on Video 2
Click rate rising while impressions fall is usually a sign the impression surface narrowed — fewer thumbnails shown, the ones shown landing better with whoever's seeing them. A common shape after a recommendation surface tightens.
Engagement
Click rate +912%, impressions -80% on Video 6
Click rate rising while impressions fall is usually a sign the impression surface narrowed — fewer thumbnails shown, the ones shown landing better with whoever's seeing them. A common shape after a recommendation surface tightens.
Traffic
Suggested Videos share rose on Video 3
Source shifts often reflect the video aging out of the surface that originally drove its views — or being rediscovered through a different one.
Traffic
21 Suggested views for a video
Suggested Videos is YouTube matching this video to viewers who watched something similar. For newer channels, it's often where early traction shows up before Browse.
Queued to happen
EMERGING
Channel Page
5 views over 3 recent days from Channel Page — typically too thin to call a trend yet. Once it clears the 30-view floor, Channel Page usually surfaces on the traffic breakdown alongside the channel's steadier sources.
Traffic breakdownEMERGING
Direct / Unknown
Across 3 recent days, Direct / Unknown has contributed 3 views — still below the 30-view threshold, but worth watching: sources that clear the floor usually show up on the traffic page with their own per-video share.
Traffic breakdownDAY 7 APPROACHING
Video 10 hits Day 7 in about 1 day. Once it crosses, the first-week view shape becomes readable on the video's placement chart.
4 more videos cross Day 7 in the next few days. Once they do, their first-week view shape can be compared against the rest of the catalog on each video's placement chart.
The Catalog
Which videos are the outliers — notes and lead changes along the bottom.
| Video | Published | Days tracked | Views | Primary traffic source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video 16 | Apr 24 | 1 | 5 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 15 | Apr 23 | 2 | 12 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 14 | Apr 22 | 3 | 11 | Browse / Homepage |
| Video 13 | Apr 21 | 2 | 1 | Channel Page |
| Video 12 | Apr 20 | 4 | 5 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 11 | Apr 19 | 2 | 5 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 10 | Apr 18 | 6 | 9 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 9 | Apr 17 | 8 | 4 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 8 | Apr 16 | 9 | 70 | Browse / Homepage |
| Video 7 | Apr 15 | 8 | 6 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 6 | Apr 14 | 10 | 23 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 5 | Apr 13 | 12 | 10 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 4 | Apr 12 | 12 | 64 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 3 | Apr 11 | 14 | 230 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 2 | Apr 10 | 15 | 65 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 1 | Apr 9 | 12 | 24 | Suggested Videos |
The Audience
Who is finding this channel?
Discovery phase: Suggested for Viewers — see Traffic.
Daily traffic mix
Each river is a traffic source; width follows daily views. Hover a stream to highlight its share over the last few days, or tap to open that source’s detail page.
Algorithmic dependency
What share of recent views came from sources where the viewer chose to come back (Direct, Channel Page, Playlist, End Screen, Link). The complementary share is algorithmic discovery (Browse, Suggested, Search). The ratio drifts as a channel matures; both extremes have legitimate channel patterns.
Persistence and replacement
Each week, what share of last week’s viewer mix came back versus how much of the mix is new. Compares the (source, country) buckets that delivered views in consecutive weeks.
32%of last week's audience came back
68%of this week's audience is new
Publishing cadence
Inter-publish gap distribution and the detected publishing pattern across the trailing 28 days. Weekend cells use a cooler tone, weekday cells a warmer one — descriptive only, not a verdict on the schedule.
Publishing cadence appears after the first 28 days.
Day-of-week rhythm
Average daily views by day of week, trailing 16 days (3 weeks of data).
The Pattern
What repeats across the catalog?
What the top quartile shares
The catalog isn’t yet large enough to read a top-quartile pattern — comes back as the catalog grows.
How daily view averages have shifted across videos over time, oldest to newest.
The scatter chart works best on a wider screen — visit on desktop to explore cross-video patterns.
The Coda
What this data doesn’t tell you.
Is this channel normal?
This site can’t answer that — no one channel can. What it shows you is one real channel, honestly. Every number here is real; nothing has been smoothed or flattered. Compare silently to whatever channels you study most often, and draw your own conclusions.
Real “normal” would come from comparing against many channels at the same stage in the same niche. That’s a future direction; it’s not something one channel’s data can answer today. Country breakdowns — views, average watch, net subscribers — are shown above. Click rate by country isn’t, since YouTube doesn’t report how often a thumbnail was shown by country. Device-type and subscribed-vs-non-subscribed splits aren't shown in this public view.
Half of this channel's subscribers came from one of 16 videos. Concentration like this is common at small catalogs and is descriptive, not a verdict.
What we tested:0 hold here·0 don't·0 inconclusive·→ See what we tested
Today's reading
This channel doesn't yet have enough data to test any beliefs in the canon.
Most of the above is drawn from 10 to 30 videos. That’s enough to see shapes, not enough to call trends reliable.
The Pattern chapter is the most fragile at this scale — treat anything there as a sketch of a trend, not a finding.