This video's arc
Video 12 had a slow-burn distribution: 92% of views came after Day 3.
Viewing this channel as it looked on May 4, 2026. 0 days before the most recent data.
Open Channel StatsEarly StagePatterns are starting to show, but the sample is still small enough that trends often shift week to week.
Days tracked
26 videos so far · 920 total views
Cold Testing
A video published in the last 7 days has too few impressions to read click-rate signal — still in early testing.
Recent uploads, last 14d
First-week candidate vs baseline
What's moved in the last 7 days.
Video 12 had a slow-burn distribution: 92% of views came after Day 3.
For Video 3, traffic from Suggested Videos moved from 93% to 99% of views (+6.5 points).
Video 5: impressions averaged 25.25/day, spiked to 56 on Day 9, then averaged 44/day after.
On May 2, 2026, a video picked up 11 views from Suggested Videos.
Video 8: impressions averaged 34.5/day, spiked to 667 on Day 3, then averaged 119/day after.
Browse / Homepage
Browse / Homepage has sent 6 views across 3 recent days on this channel. Once its running total clears the 30-view reporting floor, Browse / Homepage typically appears on the traffic breakdown as its own row.
Traffic breakdownYouTube Search
YouTube Search has sent 3 views across 3 recent days on this channel. Once its running total clears the 30-view reporting floor, YouTube Search typically appears on the traffic breakdown as its own row.
Traffic breakdownWhich videos are the outliers — notes and lead changes along the bottom.
| Video | Published | Days tracked | Views | Primary traffic source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video 26 | May 4 | 0 | 0 | (no primary source yet) |
| Video 25 | May 3 | 1 | 2 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 24 | May 2 | 3 | 4 | Browse / Homepage |
| Video 23 | May 1 | 3 | 3 | YouTube Search |
| Video 22 | Apr 30 | 1 | 1 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 21 | Apr 29 | 1 | 1 | Channel Page |
| Video 20 | Apr 28 | 6 | 4 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 19 | Apr 27 | 1 | 3 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 18 | Apr 26 | 9 | 15 | Browse / Homepage |
| Video 17 | Apr 25 | 0 | 0 | (no primary source yet) |
| Video 16 | Apr 24 | 8 | 13 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 15 | Apr 23 | 11 | 24 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 14 | Apr 22 | 11 | 14 | Browse / Homepage |
| Video 13 | Apr 21 | 12 | 4 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 12 | Apr 20 | 15 | 65 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 11 | Apr 19 | 13 | 9 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 10 | Apr 18 | 17 | 11 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 9 | Apr 17 | 15 | 11 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 8 | Apr 16 | 16 | 85 | Browse / Homepage |
| Video 7 | Apr 15 | 17 | 8 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 6 | Apr 14 | 18 | 28 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 5 | Apr 13 | 19 | 23 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 4 | Apr 12 | 20 | 90 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 3 | Apr 11 | 19 | 411 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 2 | Apr 10 | 18 | 67 | Suggested Videos |
| Video 1 | Apr 9 | 12 | 24 | Suggested Videos |
Who is finding this channel?
Discovery phase: Suggested for Viewers — see Traffic.
Each river is a traffic source; width follows daily views. Hover a stream to highlight its share over the last few days, or tap to open that source’s detail page.
What share of recent views came from sources where the viewer chose to come back (Direct, Channel Page, Playlist, End Screen, Link). The complementary share is algorithmic discovery (Browse, Suggested, Search). The ratio drifts as a channel matures; both extremes have legitimate channel patterns.
Each week, what share of last week’s viewer mix came back versus how much of the mix is new. Compares the (source, country) buckets that delivered views in consecutive weeks.
Inter-publish gap distribution and the detected publishing pattern across the trailing 28 days. Weekend cells use a cooler tone, weekday cells a warmer one — descriptive only, not a verdict on the schedule.
Publishing cadence appears after the first 28 days.
Average daily views by day of week, trailing 26 days (5 weeks of data).
What repeats across the catalog?
Retention splits across the catalog
On this channel, the top-quartile retention (8025.0%) runs about 5.4× the bottom-quartile (1480.0%) across 24 videos.
A wide split between retention tiers often reflects different formats or topics in the catalog — some videos are holding attention, others aren't. Watch the per-video retention list for which sit where.
Top-views videos and top retention sit apart
None of the 6 top-views videos with tracked retention sit in this channel's top retention quartile (top 6 of 24).
Views and retention can move together when the catalog is consistent in topic or format, or apart when different videos draw different audiences — the overlap names what is, not why.
How daily view averages have shifted across videos over time, oldest to newest.
The scatter chart works best on a wider screen — visit on desktop to explore cross-video patterns.
What this data doesn’t tell you.
This site can’t answer that — no one channel can. What it shows you is one real channel, honestly. Every number here is real; nothing has been smoothed or flattered. Compare silently to whatever channels you study most often, and draw your own conclusions.
Real “normal” would come from comparing against many channels at the same stage in the same niche. That’s a future direction; it’s not something one channel’s data can answer today. Country breakdowns — views, average watch, net subscribers — are shown above. Click rate by country isn’t, since YouTube doesn’t report how often a thumbnail was shown by country. Device-type and subscribed-vs-non-subscribed splits aren't shown in this public view.
Half of this channel's subscribers came from 2 of 26 videos. Concentration like this is common at small catalogs and is descriptive, not a verdict.
Most of the above is drawn from 10 to 30 videos. That’s enough to see shapes, not enough to call trends reliable.
The Pattern chapter is the most fragile at this scale — treat anything there as a sketch of a trend, not a finding.