“Channels with more subs per view have more engaged audiences.”
inconclusive
the sample is too thin to read
Held 24 days · Never changed on recordinconclusive on 3 of 4 pooled public channels
What the check does
Across the shared pool. Subscribers per view (lifetime subscribers over lifetime views) against how far into a video the audience typically watches — the median halfway-mark watch ratio across that channel's videos. Pearson correlation across channels; agrees at r >= 0.3, disagrees at r <= -0.3. The belief names three engagement reads; the shared data carries retention only, and the evidence records comment rate and average view duration as absent rather than substituting something else for them.
The reading
Checked on 5 channels ·
How the verdict has moved
- Aug 24, 2026 – Sep 14, 2026inconclusive
- Aug 22, 2026 – Aug 23, 2026inconclusive
Where the belief comes from
Engagement-quality folklore.
Checked against
Keep reading
The rest of the record
This belief sits in a ledger of fifty, each one re-checked every day. These surfaces carry the rest of it.